DISCLAIMER: The opinions, ratings, and reviews stated in this document and related webpages are the sole personal opinions of Wei-Hwa Huang and Wei-Hwa Huang alone. Wei-Hwa Huang does not speak for the more than 100 participants on the Mensa Mind Games selection panel. This is not an official site of Mensa Mind Games or Mensa Select, although the statements on which games are winners of Mensa Select are factually correct. Mensa Mind Games and Mensa Select are registered trademarks of American Mensa.
If you have any questions or concerns about my reviews and comments, please feel free to mail me.
Sort By Name
Sort By Ranking
Sort By Category
Party Games: Word-based
Party Games: Artistic skill
Party Games: A Variety of Tasks
"Roll Dice And Move" Games
Number and Math Games
Word and Language Games
Reflex and Reaction Games
Strategy Card Games
Strategy Dice Games
Family Strategy ("German") Games
Abstract Strategy Games -- Pure Abstract
Abstract Strategy Games -- Luck or Hidden Information
War or Combat Games
One Player Games
Games With Original Themes
(search on Board Game Geek)
In this party game, a random word is chosen (such as "volcano") and all players have 45 seconds to draw a volcano. Then, all the volcanoes are shuffled, placed in the center, and then one attribute is drawn (such as "the one that has the most action"). All players then vote on which drawing best fits the attribute, and the drawing with the most votes gains points. Up to three attributes can be drawn per picture round, although that's mostly a minor detail.
The game can potentially be pretty fun, as long as no one at the table is actually trying to win. What that means is that I'll probably never have fun with it. The problem is that, if a player is actually trying to win, the drawing part of the game is very frustrating because you don't know what attributes are going to come up, and the voting part is also annoying because clearly the best strategy is always to vote for your own painting. (The rules say "you can only vote for your own painting if it is truly deserving," but there's no penalty for violating that rule.) Overall, a nice concept, but the mechanics and scoring of the game could really use an overhaul.
Return to Introduction