Game Reviews: Mind Games, year 2006

These are Wei-Hwa Huang's personal reviews of games that might or might not have been submitted to the Mensa Mind Games event in 2006. (You'll have to go to that site to get the official list of submitted games, when they decide to post it.)

DISCLAIMER: The opinions, ratings, and reviews stated in this document and related webpages are the sole personal opinions of Wei-Hwa Huang and Wei-Hwa Huang alone. Wei-Hwa Huang does not speak for the more than 200 participants on the Mensa Mind Games selection panel. This is not an official site of Mensa Mind Games or Mensa Select, although the statements on which games are winners of Mensa Select are factually correct. Mensa Mind Games and Mensa Select are registered trademarks of American Mensa.

If you have any questions or concerns about my reviews and comments, please feel free to mail me.



Sort By Name
Sort By Ranking
Sort By Category
  • You Must Be an Idiot! (9;9;9)
  • *Keesdrow (9;7;9)
  • Pickomino (8;7;9)
  • Quelf (9;7;8)
  • *Hive (9;7;8)
  • Pünct (8;6;10)
  • *Wits & Wagers (7;8;8)
  • Zeus on the Loose (8;8;7)
  • *Pentago (8;8;7)
  • ()
  • Questionary (8;8;5)
  • Portrayal (5;7;9)
  • Pepper (9;7;5)
  • Regatta (2;9;9)
  • Linq (6;8;6)
  • Poison (7;8;5)
  • It-Dah-Gan (7;8;5)
  • Don't Quote Me - TIME for Kids Edition (9;6;5)
  • Tricky Town (5;8;6)
  • Evolution (6;7;6)
  • Codebreaker (6;7;6)
  • Sketchword (7;7;5)
  • LonPos 101 Pyramid and Rectangle Game (4;6;9)
  • The Invention Game (6;6;7)
  • Pacru 302 (7;6;6)
  • *Deflexion (7;4;8)
  • Da Vinci Code Board Game (2;9;7)
  • Top Speed (6;7;5)
  • Heximania (6;4;8)
  • Cephalopod (8;8;1)
  • Diffusion (9;7;1)
  • Space Faces (4;7;6)
  • mental_floss: The Trivia Game (6;6;5)
  • Snatch (7;6;4)
  • JabberJot (7;6;4)
  • Eve's Quest (8;6;3)
  • Gordian's Knot (2;5;10)
  • Castle Keep (3;8;5)
  • Dragon Chess (6;6;4)
  • Bonkers (6;6;4)
  • Pick Two Deluxe (7;6;3)
  • Byte (9;6;1)
  • 800: The Game of Verbal Perfection (7;5;4)
  • Thing-A-Ma-Bots (4;6;5)
  • Net Y (8;6;1)
  • Nymble (6;5;4)
  • Nerdy Wordy (6;4;5)
  • Cosmic Cows (5;5;4)
  • Baffle Gab (6;5;3)
  • Debate This! (7;3;3)
  • Jot (6;4;3)
  • Summit (3;2;7)
  • Match of the Penguins (3;5;3)
  • Mind's I (4;4;3)
  • Ringgz (5;3;2)
  • Da Vinci's Challenge Card Game (4;3;2)
  • Fikloo: The Game of Crazy Commands (5;2;1)
  • Kiss My Rules! (2;3;2)
  • Pairs or Better (4;1;2)
  • Wordigy: A World of Words for Family Fun (3;1;1)
  • Wreck the Nation: the Game of Political Misbehavior (1;2;1)
  • Urban Legends the Game (1;2;1)
  • Jot

    (search on Board Game Geek)

    small pic of Jot small pic of Jot in play

    • Replay Value (1-10): 6
    • Fun Factor (1-10): 4
    • Worth Buying (1-10): 3
    Scrabble without any tiles. Instead, you may roll a die that tells you to add 2 letters, 3 letters, draw a card, etc., and that is the constraint on the letters you must add to the board with your wet-erase marker (which, unfortunately, weren't writing or erasing very well). The special die also does double-duty as a timer; after 80 seconds, it starts counting down audibly and your time is up at 90 seconds. Hopefully, by that time, you have written a word in the grid, and it scores very similarly to Scrabble (one difference being that bonus squares are reused even if a letter was already in there).

    Our main problem with the game is that if you actually have a decent vocabulary, you're almost always better off taking the option to draw a card instead of rolling the die (if you look closely at the photograph you'll see that we wrote "MISSISSIPPI" when asked to "Add a river", for a reasonably number of points). This makes the die rather annoying, as you have to "roll" it anyway to start the timer. (However, it does have one nice advantage over a sand-timer -- you don't have to wait for it to reset.)

    Another problem I have with the game is the same one I have with Scrabble -- players who know the permissible two-letter words are going to be able to make high-scoring "parallel" plays that other players can't, even worse so as you have so much flexibility in the letters you add.

    That, plus the poor quality of the components (although I have to admit that the box is one of the sturdiest boxes I've ever seen for a board game -- this company really knows how to do boxes) means that this is not a winner over the classic Scrabble. But with the right amount of fixes ... maybe.


    Return to Introduction

    Other MMG Reviews


    By Wei-Hwa Huang